How junk science convicted an innocent The big problem with how we pick juries 1 day ago   11:10

Share
Vox
Vox
Watch the next part of False Positive: https://ufl.ae/videow/-1o8Dg0dtia

Robert Lee Stinson's trial shows how the judicial system lacks an effective filter to catch bad science before it's used to convict innocent people.

Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO

False Positive is a 30-minute documentary, split into three parts, focusing on the conviction of Robert Lee Stinson. 

Stinson was wrongly convicted of murder on the basis of forensic bite mark evidence. Through his arrest, trial, and exoneration, Vox producer Joss Fong explains the structural flaws that make the US criminal justice system vulnerable to bad science.

Watch all three parts of this mini-series:

Part 1: https://ufl.ae/videow/aym1Pl-R02s
Part 2: https://ufl.ae/videow/ruyniwAh93e
Part 3: https://ufl.ae/videow/-1o8Dg0dtia

To go even deeper into the series, become a member of the Vox Video Lab, for exclusive access to a live Q&A following the final episode, and additional behind-the-scenes details on the series. https://www.vox.com/join

Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.

Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
MailFootballSoccer

Comments 1008 Comments

Joss Fong
Thank you all for watching the 2nd episode of False Positive. Next Wednesday, we'll post Part 3 (the final episode.) If you have any questions about the story or how we made the series, I'll be hosting a livestream Q&A on February 7th for members of the Vox Video Lab: http://vox.com/join You can leave your questions here as well.

Also, just a note that Daniel Blinka, the Assistant DA who brought the charges (he appears in part 1) left the DA's office before Stinson's trial, to teach at Marquette University. So that's why he isn't in this episode - a different prosecutor tried the case.
RustytheEditor
I bit my arm to test some of this stuff
neha.m
How on earth did this so called dentist not see that the central was missing and not the lateral incisor?? I'm pretty sure that he knew he had made a mistake on this first examination and he was trying to cover up his mistake.
T Pain
Murder may be a crime

But stealing someone innocent’s years of life is more worse then any crime there is.
Bcole
So he had a bad lawyer who didn't notice the flaw in his dental records?
Haha 99
White people......
Alex Erhan
1000th comment
Kai_Mul
Anyone else wondering why he just lied about what he did that night? Like if the police ever question me ima be telling them everything I did for the whole week not just the night
Tenebris
I dont care about shitskins
galactic offital
Let me see the race card for all my African Americans.(I’m black btw)
NinjiGuy Chuong
From not on always do a lie detector
sor3999
As soon as Wisconsin was mentioned, they weren't after the truth
Chris Sean
he was black - easy conviction
Peyton Morrison
Wow
Arturo Bugarin Correa
Like Pontius Pilate that judge simply washed her hands. You can tell she doesn't care about him.
Hayitskittykat
I live in the Milwaukee area and it's cool to see a series based there
Dov Lifson
wait, did they release stinson when they found the real murderer?
EvanZilla
*People in the comments*
>Three part series talks about how a pseudoscience covicted an innocent man
>Dentists makes errors that result in Stinson being put away
>"YUP! It must be rAcIsM!"
MKE arts
why is it only one comment here
Brandon Stennett
Hey ,favor could you guys explain the NO BAIL SWEDEN SITUATION ? would help us ASAP.
Add Reply

The big problem with how we pick juries How junk science convicted an innocent 1 day ago   08:30

Share
Vox
A legal loophole makes juries less diverse.

Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO

Four years after the shooting death of Laquan McDonald, the police officer, Jason Van Dyke, faced his day in court. But in a trial where race became central to the case, there’s only one black person on the jury. And that’s in a county where nearly a quarter of people are black. How did this happen?

In jury selection, racial discrimination has historically been tricky. Discrimination isn’t allowed in jury selection, thanks to what’s called a “Batson challenge.” But the problem is — Batson has been widely regarded as a failure at keeping racism out of the jury box. Watch the video above to find out why that is, and why it complicates the prospect of a fair trial by jury.

Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.

Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H

Related Videos